MCP Tools
content_analyze
AI-analyze a piece of content.
Analyze a piece of content using AI. Returns structured breakdown including hooks, main points, call-to-action, and writing style.
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
contentId | string (UUID) | Yes | Content ID from digest_list or vault |
Example
Prompt
Analyze that Naval tweet about specific knowledgeResponse
{
"contentId": "content_abc123",
"analysis": {
"hook": {
"type": "curiosity",
"text": "Specific knowledge is knowledge you cannot be trained for.",
"effectiveness": "high",
"notes": "Opens with a counterintuitive statement that challenges conventional wisdom about education and training."
},
"structure": {
"format": "single_insight",
"pattern": "statement → implication",
"length": "short",
"readabilityScore": 92
},
"mainPoints": [
"Specific knowledge cannot be taught through traditional training",
"If knowledge can be standardized, you become replaceable",
"Value comes from unique, non-commoditized skills"
],
"cta": {
"present": false,
"type": null,
"text": null
},
"writingStyle": {
"tone": "philosophical",
"voice": "authoritative",
"techniques": [
"aphoristic",
"logical_chain",
"implied_threat"
],
"vocabulary": "simple"
},
"engagement": {
"emotionalTriggers": ["fear_of_replacement", "desire_for_uniqueness"],
"shareability": "high",
"targetAudience": "knowledge_workers",
"viralPotential": 8.5
},
"suggestions": [
"This format works well for establishing thought leadership",
"The 'if X then Y' structure creates logical inevitability",
"Could be expanded into a thread exploring types of specific knowledge"
]
},
"tokensUsed": 1250
}Response Fields
hook
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type | Hook type: curiosity, controversy, story, question, statistic |
text | The hook text extracted from content |
effectiveness | Rating: low, medium, high |
notes | Explanation of why it works |
structure
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
format | single_insight, listicle, story, thread, how_to |
pattern | Content flow pattern |
length | short, medium, long |
readabilityScore | Flesch readability score (0-100) |
writingStyle
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
tone | philosophical, casual, urgent, inspirational, etc. |
voice | authoritative, friendly, provocative, etc. |
techniques | Array of writing techniques used |
vocabulary | simple, moderate, advanced |
engagement
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
emotionalTriggers | Emotions the content targets |
shareability | low, medium, high |
targetAudience | Primary audience segment |
viralPotential | Score from 1-10 |
Token Usage
Analysis uses AI tokens from your monthly allowance. The tokensUsed field shows consumption per analysis. Check your limits with workspace_stats.
Use Cases
- Learn what makes high-performing content work
- Extract hooks and structures to adapt for your own content
- Study writing techniques from creators you admire
- Get actionable suggestions for content improvement